Karakter Arthur Fleck Dalam Kritik Sosial Film Joker (2019)

Authors

  • Rahman Hakim Stikosa-AWS
  • Riesta Ayu Oktarina Stikosa-AWS
  • Edelweis Putri Prima Stikosa-AWS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37826/digicom.v3i1.417

Keywords:

Joker Film, John Fiske's Semiotics, Habermas' Social Criticism

Abstract

For Fleck Arthur's character in the thematic film entitled Joker in 2019, the aim is to find out whether social criticism (in relation to actions, tactics, and design) Lebenswelt communication concepts) rests on how reality, depictions and teachings have eroded. . played by the character Flake in the 2019 Joker film. This study used a qualitative research method, the constructivism model. In this qualitative research, data collection techniques used the documentation method, namely recording directly the scenes from the film. This research was conducted based on a scene-by-scene analysis of the role of Arthur Fleck's character in the Joker film, which can be categorized according to Habermas' social criticism ideas, namely communicative action thinking, strategic combat action and ideas from Lebenswelt, namely world life. This classification requires a process of understanding the semiotic model of John Fiske, studies at the realist, representational, and ideological levels. The output for this research is the legitimacy of causal responses from Joker's communicative actions, namely skepticism, radicalism, anarchy to cynicism. Arthur's strategic efforts spark resistance and commotion; and Arthur Flack's Lebenswelt components were eliminated, creating a superior hierarchy.

References

Ardianto, K & Karlina. (2009). Komunikasi Massa Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Arsyad, A. (2003). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Askurifai, Baskin. (2003). Membuat Film Indie Itu Gampang. Bandung: Penerbit Kanisius.
Beilharz, P. (2003). Teori-Teori Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
DEPDIKBUD. (2005). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Effendy, O. U. (2006). Ilmu Komunikasi Teori Dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja.
Fiske, J. (2004). Cultural And Comunication Studies, Sebuah Pengantar Paling Komprehensif. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Hardiman, F. B. (2009). Demokrasi Liberatif “Menimbang Negara hokum dan ruang public dalam teori diskursus Jurgen Habermas”. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Ishwara, L. (2007). Catatan-catatan Jurnalisme Dasar. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Kriyantono, R. (2006). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Liliweri, A. (1991). Memahami Peran Komunikasi Massa Dalam Masyarakat. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Moleong, J. L. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
O’Brien, A. J. (2006). Introducing To Information System, Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
Pratista, H. (2008). Memahami film. Yogyakarta: Homerian Pustaka.
Siyoto, S & Sodik, M. A. (2015). Dasar Metodologi penelitian, Karanganyar: Literasi Media Publishing.
Slevin, C. (2003). Anarchism. London: Oxford University Press
Sobur, A. (2013). Semiotika Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suseno, F. M. Filsafat Sebagai Ilmu Kritis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Vera, N. (2015). Semiotika dalam Riset komunikasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Wibowo, I. S. W. (2006). Semiotika: Aplikasi Praktis bagi Penelitian dan Penulisan Skripsi Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: FIKOM Universitas Prof. Dr. Mestopo.
Wiryanto. (2004). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-27