Exhibitionism and Voyeurism in Live-Streaming Applications as Affection Labor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37826/spektrum.v11i1.415Keywords:
Exhibitionsm, Voyeurism, Streamimg Applications, Affections LaborAbstract
Despite having a positive impact on society, internet connectivity and accessibility have ethical consequences and have a real impact on Indonesian law. The impact of exhibitionism and voyeurism that we refer to in this work is exhibitionism and voyeurism. This practice is mediated through several new media-based communications venues. This article aims to explain these phenomena of exhibitionism and voyeurism from the perspective of a psychoanalytic framework and outline how the reification of the user into labor logic, and explain how the psychoanalytic process of consumerism is linked to nudity in live broadcasts. We collect information by monitoring the use of Live streaming applications (Bigo, Gogo-live, Tik Tok), either directly or indirectly through the YouTube program. This study concluded that consumerism, or voyeurism, occurs in live-chat streaming programs. The logic of capitalism and capitalization in the Internet and networking sectors encourage exhibitionism and voyeurism by users of live-streaming applications (labor). By turning audiences or content into commodities, voyeurism creates various commodities. In addition, nudity is a kind of merchandise from hard work that ethically has an impact like pornography which is regulated in the Indonesian legal system.
Keywords: Exhibitionism; Voyeurism; Streaming Applications; Affection Labor.
References
Angelini, A. (2021). Otto Fenichel: Ideas between two continents. In Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.3280/PU2021-001009
Barcan, R. (2004). Nudity, A Cultural Anatomy. In Nuncius (Issue 2). Oxford New York.
Baruh, L. (2010). Mediated voyeurism and the guilty pleasure of consuming reality television. Media Psychology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.502871
Bonovitz, C. (2006). The illusion of certainty in self-disclosure: Commentary on paper by Helen K. Gediman. In Psychoanalytic Dialogues (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
Brian, L. O., & Robert, L. M. (2014). Critical media studies: An Introduction (1st ed.).
Cardin, P. T., & Teixeira, M. A. (2017). Fenichel theory for multiple time scale singular perturbation problems. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1067202
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition. (2020). In Definitions. https://doi.org/10.32388/6ypoe8
Dodds, J. (2019). Otto Fenichel and Ecopsychoanalysis in the Anthropocene. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1551806X.2019.1601921
Fenichel, O. (2005). The Psycho Analytic Theory of Neurosis. Routledge.
Frank, A. W. (1995). The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society (see IRPS No. 80/95c02174). In Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie (Vol. 20, Issue 4).
Frank, A. W., & Synnott, A. (1995). The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3341866
Gediman, H. K. (1985). Imposture, inauthenticity, and feeling fraudulent. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/000306518503300408
Gossop, M. (1981). Psycho-analytic Theories of Neurosis. In Theories of Neurosis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88473-3_7
Hartman, S. (2006). Disclosure, dis-closure, diss/clothes/sure: Commentary on paper by Helen K. Gediman. In Psychoanalytic Dialogues (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
Huhtamo, E. (2012). Toward a History of Peep Practice. In A Companion to Early Cinema. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118274453.ch2
Marx, Karl. (1973). Grundrisse-Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (M. Nicolaus, Ed.). Penguin Books.
Marx, Karl. (2010). Capital-A critique of political economy. pacps.
Metzl, J. M. (2004a). From scopophilia to Survivor: A brief history of voyeurism. Textual Practice, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502360410001732935
Metzl, J. M. (2004b). Voyeur Nation? Changing Definitions of Voyeurism, 1950-2004. In Harvard Review of Psychiatry (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220490447245
Mosko, M. (2015). Margaret Grebowicz, Why Internet Porn Matters. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0-8047-8662-1. Hypatia Reviews Online, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2753906700001522
Nurbaiti, A., & Anshari, I. N. (2020). Privacy Management in Social Network Sites: A Case Study on the Use of Finstagram for Mediated Voyeurism. Jurnal Media Dan Komunikasi Indonesia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jmki.55012
Pérez Serrano Flores, V. (2015). The body and the screen: theories of Internet spectatorship. Comunicación y Sociedad, 14. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i14.1289
Slochower, J. (2006). The psychoanalytic other: Commentary on paper by Helen K. Gediman. In Psychoanalytic Dialogues (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
Twersky, R. (2020). Review of Stalker, Hacker, Voyeur, Spy: A Psychoanalytic Study of Erotomania, Voyeurism, Surveillance, and Invasions of Privacy by Helen K. Gediman. London, UK: Routledge. 2018. 244 pp. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2019.1643621
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). The Network Society : Social Aspects of New Media (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Wang, S. S. (2015). To unfriend or not: exploring factors affecting users in keeping friends on Facebook and the implications on mediated voyeurism. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.990469
White, M. (2019). The Body and the Screen. In The Body and the Screen. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1639.001.0001
Yousman, B. (2005). Review of Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Text-Reader (2nd ed.). Journal of Communication, 55(2).
