Pola Komunikasi Guru terhadap Murid Di SLB-C Alpa Kumara Wardhana Kumara 1 Surabaya Pasca pandemi Covid-19

Authors

  • Audy Maulidya Umar Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Almamater Wartawan Surabaya
  • Anita Agustina Wulandari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Almamater Wartawan Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37826/digicom.v4i1.766

Keywords:

Patterns of Communication, Instructional Theory, Educational Communication, Nonverbal Communication

Abstract

Communication is one of the important things in the learning process or education to improve communication effectiveness strategies in education. The theory used in this study is the Theory of Communication Patterns and Instructional Theory. This research was conducted using the case study method which is a type of descriptive qualitative research. The subjects in this study used interviews with 4 informants. Based on this research, it can be concluded that the pattern of teacher-student communication during the Covid-19 pandemic cannot use the media as a learning tool. Each informant had the same reason, namely deciding to study face-to-face. The four informants had differences in face-to-face learning strategies. Informant 1 freed the teachers to process learning strategies in communication patterns for their students by their vision and mission so that they could develop students' mental or motor skills. Informants 2 and 4 have the same strategy in teaching and learning by using games that make learning more fun and not boring. Meanwhile, informant 3 prefers to discuss with his students so that his students are used to conveying their feelings or emotions. This pattern of communication aims to develop memory for mentally retarded children and to be responsible and to become children who do not depend on other people in society.

References

Apriyanto, N. (2012). Seluk Beluk Tunagrahita dan Strategi Pembelajarannya. Jogjakarta: Javalitera.

Bandi, D. (2006). Pembelajaran Anak Tunagrahita. Bandung: PT Rafika Aditama.

Basuni, M. (2012). Pembelajaran Bina Diri Pada Anak Tunagrahita Ringan. In Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus: Vol. IX (Issue 1, p. 11).

Damayanti, I., & Purnamasari, S. H. (2019). Hambatan Komunikasi Dan Stres Orangtua Siswa Tunarungu Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Psikologi Insight, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17509/insight.v3i1.22311

Dyatmika, T. (2021). Ilmu komunikasi. Zahir Publishing.

Effendi, M. (2006). Pengantar psikopedagogik anak berkelainan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Fajriati, R., Na’imah, N., Hibana, H., Putro, K. Z., & Labziah, L. (2022). Pola Komunikasi dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(5), 3877–3888. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.1730

Fiske, S. T. (2012). Warmth and competence: Stereotype content issues for clinicians and researchers. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 53, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026054

Gufron, M. (2016). Komunikasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia, 145–146.

Haris, M. (2008). Pola Komunikasi Antara Guru Dan Murid Dalam Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler Di Panti Asihan Yatim Piatu Al-Andalusia Program Studi Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam Universitas Islam Negeri. Https://Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id/Dspace/Bitstream/123456789/18887/1/MUHAMMAD%20HARIS-FDK.Pdf.

Hasanah, H. (2017). Teknik-teknik observasi (sebuah alternatif metode pengumpulan data kualitatif ilmu-ilmu sosial). At-Taqaddum, 8(1), 21–46.

Hendrayani, Y., Sari, S. N. E., & Priliantini, A. (2019). Pola Komunikasi Guru kepada Siswa Penyandang Disabilitas. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 22(2).

Huda, M. N., & Purwowidodo, A. (2013). Komunikasi Pendidikan. Teoridanaplikasi Komunikasi Dalampembelajaran”. Jakarta: TulungAgung.

Izzaty, R. E., Astuti, B., & Cholimah, N. (2019). Pola Komunikasi Pendidikan. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 5–24.

Published

2024-01-31